跳转至
🎉 SedonaDB 0.4.0 已正式发布!🗺️ 新增 Python DataFrame API、R dplyr 接口、Geography 支持及 GPU 加速空间连接。阅读发布博客 →

七月 2026

SedonaDB 0.4.0 Release

The Apache Sedona community is excited to announce the release of SedonaDB version 0.4.0!

SedonaDB is the first open-source, single-node analytical database engine that treats spatial data as a first-class citizen. It is developed as a subproject of Apache Sedona. This release consists of 187 resolved issues including 26 new functions from 15 contributors.

Apache Sedona powers large-scale geospatial processing on distributed engines like Spark (SedonaSpark), Flink (SedonaFlink), and Snowflake (SedonaSnow). SedonaDB extends the Sedona ecosystem with a single-node engine optimized for small-to-medium data analytics, delivering the simplicity and speed that distributed systems often cannot.

SedonaDB 0.3.0 Release

The Apache Sedona community is excited to announce the release of SedonaDB version 0.3.0!

SedonaDB is the first open-source, single-node analytical database engine that treats spatial data as a first-class citizen. It is developed as a subproject of Apache Sedona. This release consists of 187 resolved issues including 36 new functions from 18 contributors.

Apache Sedona powers large-scale geospatial processing on distributed engines like Spark (SedonaSpark), Flink (SedonaFlink), and Snowflake (SedonaSnow). SedonaDB extends the Sedona ecosystem with a single-node engine optimized for small-to-medium data analytics, delivering the simplicity and speed that distributed systems often cannot.

Apache Sedona 2025 Year in Review

2025 was a milestone year for Apache Sedona. We made major progress in distributed spatial analytics on Spark, Flink, and Snowflake, launched a new single-node engine called SedonaDB, and pushed forward benchmarking and open geospatial data standards.

This post summarizes the most important highlights from the Apache Sedona ecosystem in 2025.

Spatial Query Benchmarking on Databricks with SpatialBench

Recently Databricks announced that Serverless SQL users "will see up to 17x faster performance compared to classic clusters with Apache Sedona installed." Unfortunately, Databricks didn’t speak to the cost of the results. It is also an apples-to-oranges comparison because the serverless compute shape and quantity that Databricks deployed to generate the 17x performance difference was not shared. Their result was also limited to specific query configurations.

We saw an opportunity to address these issues using SpatialBench, a new benchmarking framework for spatial queries. Because we are comparing different infrastructure types, our benchmark normalizes on price-performance rather than performance alone, while providing what we believe is a more comprehensive benchmarking result.

We found that only one of the simpler SpatialBench queries (#2) tested on Databricks SQL Serverless had price-performance aligned with the Databricks claim. However, we found that Sedona excelled in most other queries, delivering up to 6x better price-performance, while offering more query coverage.